The Communist Manifesto in 4 Easy Steps...

In a 1985 interview, KGB agent Yuri Bezmenov described (with eerie simplicity) the four steps and time frames involved with brainwashing an entire society (must-see video Here).

Step One - DEMORALIZATION: Not just in the standard sense of the word, as in loss of will to fight (via political correctness), but moreso in the removal of moral standards. Mr. Bezmenov's described timeframe of approximately 20 years (remember, this was in 1985) allows for three generations of primary-school students to be "indoctrinated" into this morally-vacant class of people. Many will go on to become educators and entertainers in this "new" normalcy where anything goes.

Step Two - DESTABILIZATION: Criminalize that which is legal, and legalize that which is criminal. Making more and ever far-reaching laws makes more potential criminals, effectively making law-abiding citizens fearful of each other and distrustful of law enforcement personnel, while ignoring the common enemy--the legislators. Break the citizens up into their separate groups (class warfare), political ideology, religious beliefs, skin color, union affiliation...basically, use ANY wedge that can separate ANY group of people from the citizenry as a whole and pit them against each other. Keep peeling away the thin veneer of civilized society, and then....

Step Three - CRISIS: The puppetmasters can't count on asteroids, earthquakes or tsunamis. As we saw in Japan this past March, natural catastrophes on a massive scale tends to unite the citizenry, and that is counter-productive to their agenda. Even the "man-caused disaster" of 9/11 did this to some extent within our borders, but only for a short time. No, now that the citizenry is already a cauldron of hate and distrust, and the puppetmasters only need to find the right match to toss into the mix to ignite it all. Acknowledged Communist and former Obama administration advisor Van Jones describes it as "the bottom rises up, the top comes down, and you turn the system inside-out. The only problem with Mr. Jones' ideology is that he pitches it as the "end" to which the "means" justify. Unfortunately for Mr. Jones, he and his ilk would not be a part that end to which he so eloquently ascribes.

Step Four - NORMALIZATION: Post-crisis, there will only be two groups of people. Those who rule, and those who serve the rulers. There is no middle ground, no impartial panel to decide who is who. The ruler(s) decide who belongs where, and if you refuse to serve with blind loyalty, then you are eliminated. They fail to learn from their mistakes with each reincarnation of the Communist/Socialist state, but still manage to murder millions each time they try.

Fairies, Pixie Dust, and Spending Cuts...

Here's the reason that every candidate in the recent Presidential debate said they would not accept a budget deal that included $10 in spending cuts for every $1 tax increase:

Whereas tax hikes are immediate and painful to most (except Warren Buffett, apparently), spending cuts are like unicorns--they DON'T exist, except in the liberal fantasy world stoked by OPiuM (Other People's Money).

Much like President Obama's lamentation of a government system that lets him keep his "unneeded" income, Warren Buffett doesn't mind a tax increase BECAUSE HE CAN AFFORD IT. You see, Mr. Buffett takes all his income as LONG-TERM CAPITAL GAINS, rather than salary. Why? Because the long-term cap gains tax rate is 15% instead of the highest rate of about 35%.

Accounting gimmicks like this is how our Federal Government addresses spending cuts. They will reduce "projected" spending increases in future years and call that a spending cut. Kinda like opting for a new Lexus instead of a new Mercedes...EVEN IF YOU DON'T NEED A NEW CAR!

Tax hikes can even be imposed via "automatic triggers" as found in the bogus and unconstitutional Budget Control Act of 2011. These "automatic triggers" give our elected idiots the leeway to say "Hey, I didn't vote for that last tax increase!" (no offense to true idiots intended) .

Congress costs WE THE PEOPLE $107,000,000 a week--did you get YOUR money's worth?

The truth has no agenda, Mr. President!

Lost among the Democrat talking points about the economy (as well as the AAA credit rating) that President Obama "inherited" is this little nugget of truth:

YOU SOUGHT IT VIGOROUSLY AND VICIOUSLY...YOU CHASED IT, MR. PRESIDENT...YOU SPENT THREE-QUARTERS OF A BILLION DOLLARS TO GET IT! So get off your high horse and quit crying about getting what *you* paid for.

The "bad luck" that you keep referring to...like, the "Arab Spring"? I seem to recall that you actually supported it, if not actually instigating the ouster of a long-time "ally" in Hosni Mubarak. The Japanese tsunami and earthquake was definitely a tragedy...bad luck for them, for sure. The only reason that it caused "disruptions" in OUR supply chain is because we don't make things here anymore (except excuses, which you are also quite masterful at spinning).

"Hold Me Accountable" - Barack Obama

"Count on it." - We The People

The cause of all our ills?

Scientists have recently identified a protein prevalent in the body of liberals called MORONIUM. Moronium is generally expelled from the body in the pre-teen years via scrapes, bruises, vigorous outdoor activity and occasional whacks in the head with large inflatable spheres called DODGE BALLS.

Moronium has also been observed to be absorbed by lead paint, monkey bars, leather (when vigorously applied across the buttocks) and the wood that many school principals' paddles were made of (applied in the same method as leather).

Conversely, moronium has been proven to multiply rapidly in the presence of plastic bicycle helmets (see figure 1 below), emissions from video game consoles, portable music players (via cables plugged into the ears), and lawyers. There is also a variable-frequency carrier-wave signal within several television programs (Jersey Shore, Jackass, SpongeBob are some examples) that also increases the potency of moronium.

Figure 1.

Straight From the Alinsky Playbook...

From FoxNews.com: "Democratic National Committee Communications Director Brad Woodhouse said in a statement that 'While protecting tax breaks for the wealthy and big oil while proposing to end Medicare, slash Social Security and pile additional burdens on the middle class might win plaudits with the Tea Party, it's not remotely what the American people are looking for.'"

Wow, 5 whoppers in one sentence, and nary a challenge to any of these points from the lamestream media. Here is a breakdown of this single Liberal talking point:

• (a) Tax breaks for the wealthy is a redistributionist buzzword...the Bush-era tax RATES were applied across-the-board.
• (b) Evil big oil gets a "depletion allowance" for active wells to accommodate the additional expense of pressurizing older wells that have lost natural pressurization.
• (c) Ending Medicare is another popular lie, because it's death is SPELLED OUT in detail within the 2,704 pages of ObamaCare.
• (d) Slash Social Security - Ummm, yeah, like where *IS* that lockbox we were promised?
• (e) Pile additional burdens on the middle class - Lack of specificity means inability to challenge. What "additional burdens"? Higher taxes? Got that. Higher unemployment? Got that. More government? We've already got that.

Last but not least, notice how he separates the TEA Party from the American people. Saul Alinsky realized long ago that no one with an ounce of actual intelligence would buy his crap, so he geared it downward towards the most basic component of human nature--emotion. Yes, we ALL have feelings, and no one likes getting their feelings hurt. The difference between conservatives and liberals is that liberals have no compunction HURTING someone else's feelings as long as it advances their agenda.

Communist Points of Unity

"Communism is the failure of common sense coupled with the failure of will." - Me

From the Leading Light Communist Organization's (LLCO) website:

1. Our goal is communism. Communism is the end of all oppression. We fight for a radically egalitarian social order.

2. The principal contradiction is between exploiter and exploited countries. Breaking the chains of imperialism is the first step to breaking all chains. To this end, we uphold the glorious strategy of Lin Biao’s Long Live the Victory of People’s War!. The global countryside will encircle the global cities. The proletariat in the Third World and its allies will encircle and defeat their enemies in the First World.

3. We understand that the proletariat and its allies are principally concentrated in the Third World and oppressed nations. The First World is populated by parasite classes that benefit by exploiting and oppressing the Third World. The parasite classes of the First World are enemies of the world’s peoples. The First World “working class” is an enemy of the world’s peoples. It is not a proletariat. It should be regarded as part of the imperialist bourgeoisie, or imperialist petty-bourgeoisie, or imperialist labor aristocracy.

4. We uphold the Soviet Union through the early or mid 1950s and China through the early or mid-1970s as imperfect examples of socialism. Capitalism was restored by a new bourgeoisie that arose within the Communist Party and state itself. Any single year that we establish as an exact milestone for when socialism ended and capitalism was restored will have an arbitrary element since the restoration process is complex. We are not going to pick fights over exact dates.

5. We uphold continuous revolution under the Dictatorship of the Proletariat. We uphold the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution as the furthest advance toward communism in human history.

6. We uphold the broad united front against imperialism, especially Amerikkkan imperialism. We support all of those who are exploited or oppressed and point their spears at the Great Satan, Amerika.

7. Taken together, this means we uphold Leading Light Communism.

A Victory For All

The Wisconsin Senate recall fiasco is finally drawing to a close, despite the external interference and millions of outside dollars poured into the effort to unseat the Republican majority that was fairly elected in 2010.

Both sides are claiming victory, which is to be expected. Quite understandably, the Democrats and Labor Unions can't outwardly admit that they wasted (conservatively) $31 million and a whole bunch of time and effort (and what little goodwill or sympathy may have remained) trying to overturn what was a fair election to begin with.

The real winners are...EVERYONE! The Wisconsin electoral system worked as it was designed. The results of an election were fairly challenged, and the citizens of Wisconsin stepped up to the plate and did it all again!

The issues are much pettier than all of us...both sides presented their cases to the PEOPLE, and the people made their choice--twice.

Coming Soon To A Theater Near You!!!

Yes, folks, the President has decided to go from getting his ass kicked to kicking some ass. The same Sony Pictures duo responsible for giving us the dismal cinematic failure called THE HURT LOCKER, Kathryn Bigelow and Mark Boal, have been commissioned to portray our Commander-In-Chief as the steely-eyed leader that he is not.

"The Mission To Get Bin Laden" is based upon a recent New Yorker article by Nicholas Schmidle, which is remarkably detailed in it's reconstruction, to include both verbal and non-verbal cues. When questioned in an online chat forum about the detail of his piece, he initially indicated that "the SEALs weren't the only ones listening in on the radio communications", and later admitted that he hadn't actually spoken to ANY of them when writing the piece. It is all based upon "other recollections"...i.e., the White House script.

Maureen Dowd states that "The White House had outsourced the job of manning up the president's image to Hollywood when [Mark] Boal got welcomed to the upper echelons of the White House and the Pentagon and showed up recently — to the surprise of some military officers — at a CIA ceremony celebrating the hero SEALs."

Speculation mounts, after recent sightings of Matt Damon sporting a fresh buzzcut, that he is slated to portray the President. (sarcasm mine)

GOProud vs Conservatism

I recently read an interesting article (linked HERE) by a young political activist named Toni Woods. She says that she is "...no more or no less a conservative activist because I am a lesbian. I was obviously not too perverted to enthusiastically be used a poster child for their programs prior to my coming out (emphasis mine)."

She continues..."I was empowered by their willingness to engage the dogmatic, homophobic wing of the Republican Party..." And therein is her separation from TRUE conservatism. There is a big difference between a gay Republican and a true conservative.

What Ms. Woods and the rest of the homosexual population fail to understand about true conservatism are the basic conservative beliefs that (a) who you choose to have sex with is nobody's damn business but yours, so keep it in the bedroom where it belongs, and (b) it is an aberrant behavior, not an identity trait. When you announce yourself as a "Gay Conservative", you are automatically putting your choice of sexual behavior ahead of the rest of your beliefs, as well as demanding that everybody else ACCEPT it as normal. There are people out there who get "sexual pleasure" from lighting things on fire and watching them burn, but do you support making arson a "protected" behavior?

I think it was Ronald Reagan who once said that "someone who agrees with you 80% of the time is an ally, not a 20% enemy." Ms. Woods, I applaud your stance on abortion, the sanctity of the 2nd Amendment, the need to rein in government size and scope and individual liberties. I will stand by your side and argue their merits as forcefully as I can. But if you are willing to discard any of THOSE beliefs for a forced acceptance of your sexual behavior, then I must question your definition of "conservatism".

Is this how Barack Obama was bought and paid for?

Campaign For Liberty (C4L) and Ron Paul's AUDIT THE FED movement have unearthed some startling figures, and "the revelations are sickening – so-called 'money' tossed around like confetti to banksters, foreign banks, and favored corporations."

Yep, them same "evil Wall Street fat cats" and "corporate jet owners" that PrezzO continuously vilifies while padding their bottom line in secret. "We have now learned that the Federal Reserve lent $16 TRILLION to both domestic and overseas financial institutions during the height of the financial crisis...in less than three years."

I'm not sure if that $16 Trillion number include the out-in-the-open donations of $700 Billion for TARP, $787 Billion Porkulus Package and $2.2 Trillion from both "Quantitative Easing" phases, but (according to C4L) "from December 1, 2007 to July 21, 2010, the Federal Reserve 'created reserves in the banking system' (Bernanke slang for printing money) that exceeded not only the entire U.S. GDP for a year, but also the entire U.S. national debt that's accumulated over the past 224 years!" Most of this timeframe also contains the term of the "criminal enterprise" of the 111th Congress.

The Greek bailout was likely paid for by the Fed as well, as "more than $3 trillion dollars were lent to overseas financial institutions in numerous countries, including in the U.K., Germany, and France. In addition, we learned just how much the big banks who contributed heavily to Obama, and to the crisis, were rewarded with nearly $8 Trillion to Citigroup, Morgan Stanley, Merill Lynch, and Bank of America."