Friday, November 2, 2012

When God Intervenes... the affairs of everyday man, it often goes unnoticed. These "miracles" are explained away by scientists, doctors or PhDs as the "one in a million" roll of the dice, and echoed by the Lamestream media, using the same "scientific" justification of the "experts".

This young lady has one see that Muslim women have the same opportunity for education as her male counterparts. In predominantly Muslim cultures, Shari'a law prohibits this...she was targeted for assassination because of her views. She survived multiple gunshot wounds, several to her head, when gunmen sought her out, by name, and opened fire.

There is no scientific explanation why she is still alive, and recovering from her wounds. Scientists, by nature, cannot admit this...are they not, after all, our ultimate authority?

I say...God intervened, for the benefit of us all. Let's learn a lesson in TRUE courage in the face of adversity.

Saturday, September 1, 2012

Who Am I?

I was born in one country, raised in another.

My father was born in another country. I was not his only child. He fathered several children with numerous women.

I became very close to my mother, as my father showed no interest in me. My mother died at an early age from cancer.

Although my father deserted me and my mother raised me, I later wrote a book idolizing my father, not my mother.

Later in life, questions arose over my real name. My birth records were sketchy. No one was able to produce a legitimate, reliable birth certificate.

I grew up practicing one faith but converted to Christianity, as it was widely accepted in my new country, but I practiced non-traditional beliefs and didn't follow Christianity, except in the public eye under scrutiny.

I worked and lived among lower-class people as a young adult, disguising myself as someone who really cared about them. That was before I decided it was time to get serious about my life and embarked on a new career.

I wrote a book about my struggles growing up. It was clear to those who read my memoirs, that I had difficulties accepting that my father abandoned me as a child.

I became active in local politics in my 30s. Then, with help behind the scenes, I literally burst onto the scene as a candidate for national office in my 40s. They said I had a golden tongue and could talk anyone into anything

I had a virtually non-existent resume, little work history and no experience in leading a single organization. Yet I was a powerful speaker, and citizens were drawn to me as though I were a magnet and they were small roofing tacks. I drew incredibly large crowds during my public appearances. This bolstered my ego.

At first, my political campaign focused on my country's foreign policy... I was very critical of my country in the last war and seized every opportunity to bash my country. But what launched my rise to national prominence were my views on the country's economy.

I put forth a really good plan on how we could do better, and every poor person would be fed and housed for free. I knew which group was responsible for getting us into this mess. It was the free market, banks and corporations. I decided to start making citizens hate them; and, if they became envious of others who did well, the plan was clinched tight.

I called mine "A People's Campaign.” That sounded good to all people.

I was the surprise candidate because I emerged from outside the traditional path of politics and was able to gain widespread popular support. I knew that if I merely offered the people 'hope', together we could change our country and the world. So, I started to make my speeches sound like they were on behalf of the downtrodden, poor, ignorant to include "persecuted minorities."

My true views were not widely known, and I kept them unknown until after I became my nation's leader. I had to carefully guard reality, as anybody could have easily found out what I really believed if they had simply read my writings and examined those people I associated with. I'm glad they didn't.

Then I became the most powerful man in the world. And then the world learned the truth.

Who am I?

Thinking of SOMEONE ELSE? You need to go to your local cinema and see "2016: Obama's America" to realize who and what Obama is...

Sunday, August 12, 2012

Poster Boy Of Liberal Hypocrisy...

If I could point to one figure who is a singular personification of the idiocy of the left, John Kerry would be my top choice...although psychotic, drug-addled Bob Beckel would be a close second. But, I have to give the Massachusetts senator credit, no one makes my point better than he does...that wealth distributes itself one helluva lot better than the US Government.
One of his BFFs....

Since you have likely never read or heard this story in ANY lamestream media outlet, even when Kerry was (gasp) an EVIL RICH 2004 PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE, no worries--I have done the digging. No Julias here...I bring you the story of ISABEL.

ISABEL is John Kerry's $7 MILLION, 76-foot sloop, built in New Zealand by FRIENDSHIP YACHTS (outsourcing?). According to the BOSTON HERALD, ISABEL has two cabins, an opulently-furnished galley, and a pilot house fitted with a wet bar and cold wine storage (best place to keep the alcohol, right next to the steering wheel).

ISABEL is moored in neighboring Rhode Island, not at the Kerry mansion or his summer home on Nantucket, because of the crippling Massachusetts taxes guessed it...the EVIL MILLIONAIRES. If ISABEL were kept at the 2004 Democratic presidential nominee's summer vacation home on Nantucket, or in Boston Harbor near his city residence, he would be liable to the cash-strapped Bay State for $437,500 in one-time sales tax, as well as  $70,000 in annual excise taxes. Rhode Island repealed those taxes in 1993, making it somewhat of a nautical tax haven for Massachusetts' wealthy.

Kerry's explanation for this is not tax avoidance, but "for long-term maintenance, upkeep and charter purposes."

Not a football player...

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Take The Gloves Off Or Get Out Of The Way....

 Mitt...You are going up against the undisputed kings of dirty politics...The Chicago Cabal is not going to take it easy on you, or your family. Things are going to get much uglier, and much faster. If you are IN IT TO WIN IT, then take the gloves off....the American people want to see a John Wayne going against the half-black Hitler...we want to see Captain America punching him in the face. Being nice is not going to cut it this time around.

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

"Supreme" Betrayal? Or a coded SOS?

Nothing in politics is coincidence...if it is, they simply re-define a "coincidence" to become the result of a behind-the-scenes strategy. The Supreme Court is Constitutionally-designed to be a strictly apolitical branch of the government. Justices are appointed for LIFE, so that their popularity and re-election are not factors in their judicial decisions.

For whatever reason, four of the justices are always expected to vote one way on any given decision and five justices are expected to vote the opposite way. In this particular case, the "prevailing" winds were blowing against Obamacare's UNPRECEDENTED POWER GRAB by the Federal Government. All the political pundits, the talking faces on the news networks, all the inside-the-Beltway "experts" and pretty much any American who has paid ANY attention to this matter at all were expecting Obamacare to be shot down by a 5-4 vote.

So what happened? It's anybody's guess at this point, but a careful analysis of the facts at hand would indicate that something is very, very wrong with this decision. Every one of the "experts" believed that Justice Kennedy was the swing vote, but the evidence provided via unprecedented press "leaks" indicate that he was firmly against this law from the outset. These "leaks" indicate that Chief Justice Roberts changed his vote at the last minute by indicating that while Congress can't force citizens INTO commerce, it can tax them for not engaging in it.

So why would a staunchly conservative Chief Justice cross the aisle on an UNPRECEDENTED POWER GRAB by the Federal Government? A simple application of Occam's Razor (the explanation with the fewest assumptions is generally the correct one) comes up with one conclusion...he was THREATENED.

Justice Kagan, an Obama appointee, argued for Obamacare as his Solicitor General, and had represented his interests in several lawsuits concerning his eligibility for the highest office. She was his "insider" into the machinations of the Court's deliberations on this matter, and probably reported to him directly on a daily basis as to the status of the deliberations. Of the 2 Dubya appointees to the Supreme Court, Roberts was the easy choice to target in keeping with the "Blame Bush" mentality...he is the younger than Alito, he is the Chief Justice, and he is a DC Circuit Appellate Judge (Alito came from outside the Beltway, the 3rd Circuit).

Justice Roberts is sending us a ruling on this as a taxation, and not an act of commerce, it can de defeated by a simple majority (50+1) in the Senate instead of a 60-vote supermajority. In addition, it can also be defunded by Congressional majorities in the House and Senate, or repealed by a new President.

"It is easier to fool someone than to convince them that they have been fooled." - Mark Twain

Thursday, May 24, 2012

Privacy and Anonymity...Gone Forever?

Back in the good old days, one had reasonable expectations of both. One's own home was supposed to be a fortress of privacy...expectation of anonymity was nil because your name was on the mailbox at the curb. On the other side of the coin was public anonymity...expectation of privacy is nil because HELLO...YOU'RE OUTSIDE WHERE EVERYONE CAN SEE YOU.

One of the facets of a police state (total control in the name of public safety) is to remove both. One of the primary Constitutional protections of the 4th Amendment is to prevent the capital "s" State from invading that sole bastion of privacy unless authorities can provide "prima facie" evidence to a judge that criminal activity is occurring.

Another facet of a police state is to know where every citizen is, and question why they are there. The surveillance state, with it's cameras anywhere and everywhere, have used the excuse of public safety to pursue and inject bio-metric and facial recognition software into every facet of our lives. They say the average Briton is photographed some 6,000 to 10,000 times PER DAY, without their permission.

I should say, without their EXPLICIT permission...but the citizens have given that power implicitly to the authorities by allowing surveillance laws to go unchalleneged. Our elected officials tell us that it is for our own safety, to make it easier to catch criminals and as a deterrent to crime. However, as more and more activities are criminalized, more and more everyday citizens are getting caught up in this web of "protection by deception". Ayn Rand warned that in order to keep the populace-at-large "under control", EVERYDAY BEHAVIOR must have some criminal implication, with fear of arrest weighing first and foremost on everyone's mind at every moment.

The advent of the internet bought about an entirely new and extreme "threat" to the entirely new form of privacy AND anonymity in one little box. We are in a new generation whether everything that is said, filmed, photographed or typed is now "out there" FOREVER. Once you turn this little box on, you are "on the record" permanently and indelibly.

Saturday, May 19, 2012

Bumblin Biden strikes again...

Our "esteemed" Veep's latest verbal contribution to the class warfare rhetoric..."They just don't get us..." makes about as much sense as a bicycle lane in a shipping channel. Contextually, his "they" refers to Republicans specifically, but Conservatives in general, while his "us" refers to Democrats and liberals.

Well, lo and behold, even a stopped clock is right twice a day (which is a far better batting average than the Veepster is sporting), but in his cluelessness, he hit upon the truth. You're right, Joe, we DON'T get you. I mean, how easy is it to wrap your brain around the idea that a supposedly-devout Catholic supports pre-natal murder and forced acceptance of aberrant behavior? I have difficulty grasping the concept that you are all about the middle-class, while forcing more and more into poverty.

Yes, Joe, those of us with half a brain DON'T GET IT. Pardon US if we don't bother trying and just keep pointing out the lunacy of liberalism.

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

The Reginald Denny lesson...

During the 1992 LA riots, Mr. Denny was yanked from his truck in the middle of an intersection by a group of black men. They set upon him and smashed a cinderblock (seen in the photo right below the gas tank) into his face, leaving him for dead, and DANCED and CHEERED.

Why? Because he was white.

Reginald Denny, after many painful surgeries and months of rehabilitation, went to the jail where his assailants were serving time and FORGAVE them to their faces.

Reverend Jackson and the rest of the Black Community would be better served by teaching their children THIS lesson.

Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Understanding The Power of Prejudice

First off, a disclaimer...I do not use, and have no tolerance for those who use, the terms "racism" or "racist". This comes from a long-held belief imparted upon me by my mother in my early childhood, that there is only one race--the human race. Any perception or misperception of differences between those of different skin color, based solely upon skin color, is prejudicial in nature and based on upbringing and experience.

The prejudicial mindset is actually a mental time-saving and survival mechanism built into the human brain. It saves us from having to repeatedly burn ourselves touching hot ovens by subconsciously "pre-judging" them to be a source of pain, and we learn to check them first. By the same token, interactions with people teach us over time to "pre-judge" them, based on appearance, behavior and yes, skin color.

Prejudicial behavior is developed over time and embedded into our sub-conscious. Any prejudice is either reinforced or attenuated as experience is gained. When a positive experience occurs, we tend to migrate towards those situations or people, to subconsciously seek out those experiences. Likewise, a negative outcome reinforces the subconscious to "steer" us away from those situations or people that led to the negative experience.

What is a natural human behavior has become that which is all too frequently, and all too mistakenly, called "racism". It is only once it is understood that it can be intellectually addressed and put to positive use within society.

Sunday, February 19, 2012

To Sheriff Paul Babeu...

Sheriff Babeu,

It is with a heavy heart and a hole in my soul as I write this. I am definitely no bastion of morality, but You, sir, are in a position that, a position that DEMANDS it.

I like to think that I choose wisely in those who I are the third one that has let me down. The first was astronaut and Senator John Glenn, and the second was former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich. That's some pretty heady company you keep, Sheriff, at least in my mind.

How does one recognize the so-called heroism of a firefighter who rescues people from a fire that he started? How does one cheer the accomplishmenhts of a beautiful, accomplished singer and actress like Whitney Houston who donated many of her millions to charity, but spent the majority of it on drugs? You can't deny the good that one does, but you also can't ignore the harm that one causes!

Sheriff, you have your constituents, your compadres, and the citizens of America...those like me, who stood with you because of who you told us you were...not who you turned out to be.

Friday, February 10, 2012

The Contraceptive Kerfluffle...

This latest revelation threaded deep within the bloated Socialist monstrosity called OBAMACARE is just another Progressive sleight-of-hand to keep your focus away from the real issue. Today, during a 5-minute interview, I heard HHS Director Kathleen Sebelius refer to the contraceptive mandate as an "important women's health provision" SIX times.

"Repeat the lie often enough and they will believe it." - Adolf Hitler

Remember the President's words about not wanting his daughters to be "punished with a baby for making a mistake"? The issues surrounding abortion, birth control, RU-486 (morning after pill) and Planned Parenthood have nothing to do with women's reproductive rights, women's health or even casual sex. It *IS* all about Population Control or Sustainable Development or whatever innocuous-sounding term the total-government Progressives are using these days to mask their Communist agenda for a New World Order.

"The only difference between a welfare state and a totalitarian state is time." - Ayn Rand

Thursday, January 26, 2012

Losing Freedom

Sometimes it is as blatant as ratcheting click-click-click of handcuffs painfully pinning your hands behind your back…the echoing, metallic clang of a jail cell door slamming shut behind you…or your President signing into law a National Defense Authorization Act with murky language giving Government unprecedented power to arrest and detain American citizens on American soil without due process.
More often, though, it is something as innocent-looking and innocuous as a car’s seat belts or a bicycle helmet…a NO RIGHT TURN ON RED sign…or your President signing into law something as noble-sounding as the Patient Affordable Care Act.
There are all kinds of analogies for it…camel’s nose under the tent flap and frog-in-the-pot-syndrome are two that immediately come to mind. It is the insidious slow and creeping erosion of liberty that isn’t noticeable on a minute-by-minute basis, but when you look at the BEFORE and AFTER pictures it becomes readily apparent...“HOW THE HELL DID WE MISS THAT?”
A lawyer and politician himself, Daniel Webster (1782-1852) warned us long ago that “…our destruction, should it come at all, will be from…the inattention of the people to the concerns of their government, from their carelessness and negligence, I must confess that I do apprehend some danger. I fear that they may place too implicit a confidence in their public servants, and fail properly to scrutinize their conduct; that in this way they may be made the dupes of designing men, and become the instruments of their own undoing.”
Warnings like this are prevalent throughout the writings of the wisest of men throughout time. Webster recognized that in governance, “good intentions will always be pleaded for every assumption of authority…[the] strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures.” Webster also stated that “[it] is hardly too strong to say that the Constitution was made to guard the people against the dangers of good intentions.” Good intentions are the lifeblood of the liberal mindset, highlighted by the illogical fallacy that what benefits one, by extension, must benefit all.
The problem lies in the power paradigm…local, state and national governments don’t EARN the money that they spend. Rather, it is TAKEN from the citizens that they are supposed to serve. The old adage of absolute power corrupting absolutely begins to take form.
Another of Webster’s observations points out that “[there] are men in all ages who mean to govern well, but they mean to govern. They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters.” The combination of this “do-gooder” mentality coupled with the power to take what it needs from the populace is a dangerous mixture.
George Washington knew from experience that “government is like fire, a dangerous servant and a fearful master.” Once government gets involved in any affairs, however peripherally, it NEVER leaves and only involves itself further.